Analytical Framework: Social Ecosystem and Development Process

The workhorse of this research thesis has been an analytical framework that analyzes the social ecosystem and development process of two- to four-unit buildings. The framework was inspired by Bloom and Dees whose work on community development financial institution Self-Help Credit Unions effectively analyzed its social ecosystem and re-shaped the home mortgage market and prospects for low-wealth borrowers and clients (Bloom & Dees, 2008). The first component of the social ecosystem are the “players” (individuals and organizations): a web of interrelated individuals and organizations who are capable of exhibiting some form of agency that is pertinent to two- to four-unit building market, including resource providers, partners, alternative providers of housing, customers, problem makers and bystanders. The environmental conditions represent a second component that shapes which players can exist and their relationship with each other, including the economy, laws and regulations, demographics, culture and geography. I augmented this framework by explicitly incorporating the process of real estate development, the acquisition, renovation, disposition and management of two- to four-unit properties.

The analytical process transformed many qualitative insights into a detailed examination of the social ecosystem. Though I recorded (with permission) all but a few of my interviews, I opted not to transcribe the majority of the interviews. I developed a 35-column database to organize the following background information for each informant, including detailed notes from the interview, and to perform a quick check about the important implications.

Category Informant Database Columns
Source Background Information Type
Name of Source
Stakeholder Category
Date Conducted
Title & Affiliation
Contact Information
Permissions Granted
General Causes of Vacancy
Choice Neighborhoods Efforts
Environmental Conditions Economics and Markets
Politics
Public Policy and Administrative Structures
Geography and Infrastructure
Social and Cultural Factors
Historical Factors
Players Resource Providers
Competitors
Complementary Organizations and allies
Beneficiaries and customers
Opponents and problem makers
Affected and influential bystanders
Development Processes Acquisition
Renovation
Sales, Leasing and Disposition of Buildings & Property Management
Capital Availability
Preliminary Analysis What people, event or situations were involved?
What were the main theme or issues in the contact?
Which research questions and which variables in the initial framework did the contact bear on most centrally?
What new hypotheses, speculations, or hunches about the field situations were suggested by the contact?
Where should the field-worker place most energy during the next contact, and what kinds of information should be sought?

The primary reason for constructing a database was to translate hours of interviews into passages of written text (short of transcription) that could be re-organized and sorted by question as opposed to informant. Generating summaries of each question allowed them to be coded for the themes, conflicts, anecdotes and patterns. The classification scheme was employed through the discretion of the author according to criteria based on social ecosystem literature. Through an iterative process, I clarified the meaning of the categories, whether information was pertinent and where it falls in the analytical frame.

<– Previous Section | Next Section –>